Networked vehicles, automated driving and intelligent transportation systems are reshaping mobility with unprecedented levels of convenience and safety. But at the same time, they open up additional attack vectors for cyber criminals. Cyber attacks comes in many forms and could have catastrophic consequences, from ransom demands to terrorist activity.
There is an urgent need to effectively manage the growing risk of cyber attacks on both individual vehicles and the wider mobility ecosystem. This is where regulations, standards and best-practice guidance can make a real difference. WP.29’s new regulation on cyber security (R155) requires all new car lines launched from existing electronic architectures to obtain cyber security system type approval as part of the process of whole vehicle type approval. Could this be the key to securing the software-defined car?
- Automotive rewrites the rules for cyber security
- UNECE reveals how new regulations will improve security
- Does the US approach to cyber security make WP.29 redundant?
- The cyber security catch: the joys of connected cars comes with a caution
- How do you regulate constantly evolving vehicle software?
- Are cyber security standards holding back AI applications in vehicles?
- The culture of cyber security is vital, not the regulation
‘Special report: WP.29 and the future of automotive cybersecurity’ presents insight from:
- Aurora Labs
- BlackBerry
- Capgemini
- Horiba Mira
- IBM
- Keysight Technology
- The Qt Company
- UL
- UNECE
Subscribe to Automotive World to continue reading
Sign up now and gain unlimited access to our news, analysis, data, and research
Already a member?
